Four.Meme vs BNBpump.fun: Complete Feature Comparison for BNB Chain Meme Coin Creators

The BNB Chain meme coin ecosystem has exploded in popularity, with multiple launchpads competing for creators and traders. Two platforms stand out as the leading options: Four.Meme and BNB Pump.fun. This comprehensive comparison breaks down everything you need to know about both platforms to make an informed decision for your next meme coin launch.

 

Platform Overview

 

Both Four.Meme and BNBpump.fun operate on BNB Chain, offering fair-launch mechanics inspired by Solana's pump.fun. These platforms eliminate presales, team allocations, and insider advantages, giving all participants equal access from the start. However, significant differences in fees, bonding curves, and liquidity mechanics set them apart.

 

Four.Meme Background

 

Four.Meme launched in mid-2024 and quickly became a dominant force in the BNB Chain meme coin space. Incubated by veteran BNB Chain team BinaryX, the platform has launched over 77,000 tokens and recorded impressive metrics, including over 812,000 daily unique users during peak activity in October 2025.

 

BNBpump.fun Background

 

BNBpump.fun emerged as a streamlined alternative focused on minimizing costs for creators and traders. The platform prioritizes accessibility with the lowest trading fees in the market and a simplified graduation process.

 

Fee Structure Comparison

 

One of the most critical factors for meme coin creators is the fee structure. Here's how both platforms compare:

 

| Fee Type | Four.Meme | BNBpump.fun |

|----------|-----------|-------------|

| Token Creation Fee | ~0.005 BNB | 0.01 BNB |

| Trading Fee | 1% | 0.1% |

| Migration Fee | 0.5 BNB | Included |

 

Trading Fee Analysis

 

The trading fee difference is substantial. Four.Meme charges a 1% fee per transaction during internal pool trading, while BNBpump.fun offers an industry-leading 0.1% trading fee. For active traders and high-volume tokens, this difference compounds significantly:

 

  • $10,000 trading volume: Four.Meme costs $100 in fees vs. BNBpump.fun costs $10
  • $100,000 trading volume: Four.Meme costs $1,000 in fees vs. BNBpump.fun costs $100
  • $1,000,000 trading volume: Four.Meme costs $10,000 in fees vs. BNBpump.fun costs $1,000

 

The 10x fee reduction on BNBpump.fun directly benefits both creators (through higher trading activity) and traders (through lower costs per transaction).

 

Bonding Curve Mechanics

 

Both platforms utilize bonding curve mechanisms to determine token prices and manage liquidity before graduation to decentralized exchanges.

 

Four.Meme Bonding Curve

 

Four.Meme's bonding curve reaches completion at approximately 24 BNB (some sources cite ~18 BNB depending on configuration). When the curve reaches 100%, liquidity is automatically seeded to PancakeSwap, enabling public trading. The platform deducts a fixed fee of 0.5 BNB from the liquidity to cover migration costs.

 

BNBpump.fun Bonding Curve

 

BNBpump.fun features a lower graduation threshold of 10 BNB. This lower barrier to graduation means:

 

  • Faster path to DEX listing
  • Lower capital requirements for successful launches
  • Quicker liquidity establishment
  • Reduced risk of stalled projects

 

Graduation Threshold Comparison

 

| Metric | Four.Meme | BNBpump.fun |

|--------|-----------|-------------|

| Graduation Threshold | 24 BNB | 10 BNB |

| DEX Destination | PancakeSwap | PancakeSwap |

| Migration Fee | 0.5 BNB | Included |

 

The graduation threshold difference is significant. Four.Meme's 24 BNB requirement means projects need to generate substantially more trading volume before graduating. While this can indicate stronger community support, it also means many promising projects may never reach graduation.

 

Industry data shows that only around 1.3% of meme coins launched on Four.Meme "graduate" to PancakeSwap liquidity. The lower 10 BNB threshold on BNBpump.fun could potentially improve graduation rates by making the milestone more achievable.

 

User Experience Comparison

 

Four.Meme UX

 

Four.Meme offers a no-code interface where creators can:

  • Connect a wallet
  • Enter basic token details (name, symbol, logo)
  • Deploy their coin with a few clicks

 

The platform has processed over 9,646 graduating tokens to PancakeSwap and maintains strong brand recognition in the BNB Chain ecosystem.

 

BNBpump.fun UX

 

BNBpump.fun provides a similarly streamlined experience with:

  • Instant token creation
  • Real-time bonding curve visualization
  • Lower entry barriers for new creators
  • Simplified fee structure

 

Liquidity and Trading Volume

 

Four.Meme Performance

 

During October 2025's "meme season," Four.Meme generated over $1.4 million in 24-hour revenue, temporarily surpassing even Solana's Pump.fun. The platform's total value locked (TVL) reached approximately 5,648 BNB, with cumulative protocol revenue exceeding 33,000 BNB.

 

BNBpump.fun Advantage

 

BNBpump.fun's significantly lower trading fees (0.1% vs 1%) create an environment conducive to higher trading volumes. Lower fees reduce friction for traders, potentially leading to:

 

  • More frequent trades
  • Higher overall volume
  • Better price discovery
  • Increased liquidity depth

 

Security Considerations

 

Both platforms operate on BNB Chain's established infrastructure. However, it's worth noting that in February 2025, Four.Meme suffered a liquidity exploit causing approximately $183,000 in losses. This incident highlighted the importance of:

 

  • Verifying contract safety
  • Relying on audited projects
  • Approaching new launches cautiously

 

When selecting a platform, consider security track records and the measures each platform implements to protect users.

 

Pros and Cons Summary

 

Four.Meme

 

Pros:

  • Established brand recognition
  • Large existing user base
  • Proven track record with thousands of graduated tokens
  • Strong integration with BNB Chain ecosystem

 

Cons:

  • Higher trading fees (1%)
  • Higher graduation threshold (24 BNB)
  • Additional migration fee (0.5 BNB)
  • Lower graduation rate (~1.3%)

 

BNBpump.fun

 

Pros:

  • Lowest trading fees (0.1%)
  • Lower graduation threshold (10 BNB)
  • More accessible for new creators
  • Better cost efficiency for high-volume trading

 

Cons:

  • Newer platform
  • Building user base
  • Less historical data available

 

Which Platform Should You Choose?

 

Choose Four.Meme if:

  • You value established platforms with proven track records
  • You're targeting users already familiar with the Four.Meme ecosystem
  • You plan to leverage potential Binance Alpha or Meme Rush integrations
  • Brand recognition matters more than fee optimization

 

Choose BNBpump.fun if:

  • Minimizing costs is your priority
  • You want the lowest possible trading fees (0.1%)
  • A lower graduation threshold (10 BNB) better suits your project
  • You're looking for maximum cost efficiency

 

Conclusion

 

Both Four.Meme and BNBpump.fun offer viable paths for launching meme coins on BNB Chain. Four.Meme brings established infrastructure and brand recognition, while BNBpump.fun delivers significant cost advantages through its 0.1% trading fees and 10 BNB graduation threshold.

 

For cost-conscious creators and traders, BNBpump.fun's fee structure represents substantial savings that compound with trading volume. The lower graduation threshold also makes successful launches more achievable for projects of all sizes.

 

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific priorities: established ecosystem presence versus cost optimization. Both platforms continue to evolve, and the competition between them benefits the entire BNB Chain meme coin community through innovation and improved offerings.